List of recommended candidates for the post of Junior Proof
Reader- Advertisement No. 1/2011
Based on the performance of the candidates
in the preliminary examination, main examination and interview, the following 4 candidates in the order
listed
|
below are
|
being provisionally recommended
|
for
|
appointment as
Junior Proof
|
|
Reader: -
S.No
|
Roll No. Name
|
|
Category
|
|
1
|
500304
|
SAURABH BATRA
|
UR
|
|
2
|
500107
|
RAKHI SAKSENA
NIGAM
|
UR
|
|
3
|
500103
|
POOJA RANI
|
UR
|
|
4
|
500320
|
PRIYANKA KUMARI
|
OBC
|
The candidate
at Sl. No. 4 was shortlisted for the Interview
on the basis of
relaxed cut off marks adopted for OBC candidates in the Main Examination and, therefore, is being recommended against the OBC vacancy.
The recommendation for appointment of the above candidates is provisional and is subject to verification of required
documents and fulfillment by the candidates of eligibility conditions prescribed for the post.
The candidature of Shri Ravinder (Roll No. 500288)
has been cancelled
on account of submission of conflicting experience certificates by him.
Following 05 candidates have been found ineligible for the reasons mentioned against their
names: -
|
Sl.No.
|
Name
|
Roll No.
|
Reasons for ineligibility
|
|
1.
|
Praveen Kumar
|
500271
|
Result of PG Diploma in Book Publishing was declared after last date of submission of application form and therefore the candidate did not fulfill educational qualifications prescribed for
the post on the last date of receipt
of application.
Moreover, the candidate has failed to produce by the prescribed date
a certificate to the effect
that the Bandematram, where he gained
experience, comes under the purview
of the Factories Act, 1948.
|
|
2.
|
Radhe Sham Bishnoi
|
500042
|
The candidate has failed to produce
by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect
that the Rama Times
comes under
the purview of the Factories Act, 1948 and Dainik Bhaskar has informed that the experience gained by the candidate is not equivalent to Copy Holder/Proof Reader.
The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.
|
|
3.
|
Rakesh Tiwari
|
500240
|
(i)
The candidate has failed
to produce by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect
that the Mangalam Publishers comes
under the purview
of the Factories Act, 1948 and that the experience gained
at Geeta Press, Gorakhpur, Deptt. of Printing Technology, G.J.U.S&T, Hissar,
Somany Institute of Engineering and Technology, Rewari
and Deptt. of Printing Technology, Pusa
Polytechnic, New Delhi is equivalent to Copy
Holder/Proof Reader.
(ii)
Shukla Typesetters & Printers and Young Global have informed that these organizations do not come under
the purview of the Factories Act, 1948.
The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.
|
|
4.
|
Gantantra Kumar
|
500156
|
Triton Communications Pvt. Ltd. has informed that the organization does not come under the purview
of the Factories Act, 1948. The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.
|
|
5.
|
Sunil Kumar
|
500101
|
The candidate has failed to produce
by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect
that the experience gained at Thomson Digital is equivalent to Copy Holder/Proof Reader and that the organization comes
under the
purview of the Factories Act, 1948.
The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.
|
No comments:
Write comments