Sunday, 7 June 2015

Rajya Sabha Secretariat Declared The Selected Candidate List post For Junior Proof Reader- Advt No. 1/2011

 

List of recommended candidates for the post of Junior Proof Reader- Advertisement No. 1/2011

Based on the performance of the candidates in the preliminary examination, main examination and interview, the following 4 candidates          in the order listed


below  are
being  provisionally  recommended
for
appointment  as  Junior  Proof
Reader: -
S.No

Roll No.      Name


Category

1
500304
SAURABH BATRA
UR
2
500107
RAKHI SAKSENA NIGAM
UR
3
500103
POOJA RANI
UR
4
500320
PRIYANKA KUMARI
OBC

The candidate at Sl. No. 4 was shortlisted for the Interview on the basis of
relaxed cut off marks adopted for OBC candidates in the Main Examination and, therefore, is being recommended against the OBC vacancy.

The recommendation for appointment of the above candidates is provisional and is subject to verification of required documents and fulfillment by the candidates of eligibility conditions prescribed for the post.

The candidature of Shri Ravinder (Roll No. 500288) has been cancelled on account of submission of conflicting experience certificates by him.

Following 05 candidates have been found ineligible for the reasons mentioned against their names: -

Sl.No.
Name
Roll No.
Reasons for ineligibility
1.
Praveen Kumar
500271
Result of PG Diploma in Book Publishing was declared after last date of submission of application form and therefore the candidate did not fulfill educational qualifications prescribed for the post on the last date of receipt of application.
Moreover, the candidate has failed to produce by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect that the Bandematram, where he gained experience, comes under the purview of the Factories Act, 1948.
2.
Radhe Sham Bishnoi
500042
The candidate has failed to produce by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect that the Rama Times comes under the purview of the Factories Act, 1948 and Dainik Bhaskar has informed that the experience gained by the candidate is not equivalent to Copy Holder/Proof Reader. The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.



3.
Rakesh Tiwari
500240
(i)      The candidate has failed to produce by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect that the Mangalam Publishers comes under the purview of the Factories Act, 1948 and that the experience gained at Geeta Press, Gorakhpur, Deptt. of Printing Technology, G.J.U.S&T, Hissar, Somany Institute of Engineering and Technology, Rewari and Deptt. of Printing Technology, Pusa Polytechnic, New Delhi is equivalent to Copy Holder/Proof Reader.
(ii)    Shukla Typesetters & Printers and Young Global have informed that these organizations do not come under the purview of the Factories Act, 1948.
The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.
4.
Gantantra Kumar
500156
Triton Communications Pvt. Ltd. has informed that the organization does not come under the purview of the Factories Act, 1948. The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.
5.
Sunil Kumar
500101
The candidate has failed to produce by the prescribed date a certificate to the effect that the experience gained at Thomson Digital is equivalent to Copy Holder/Proof Reader and that the organization comes under the purview  of the Factories Act, 1948. The candidate, therefore, has not been able to establish that he possesses requisite experience prescribed for the post.



No comments:
Write comments